Technology in Haiti

I just wanted to take a few minutes to talk about the useful roles different technologies are playing in the recovery efforts in Haiti. I’ll be speaking from my experience, but it is definitely not limited to how I used it.

WiFi- everything I used hinges on WiFi. With it I was able to use my iPod Touch to access the internet. Though food, water, and shelter are vital needs of the people, WiFi and internet access in general are playing a big role in the coordination of relief.

Twitter-Before I even left Twitter was helpful. People that saw my tweets about going to Haiti contacted contacted me. Through several degrees of communication, people in 4 different cities who had never met before coordinated to get more supplies down there. Now that I’m back, I’ve had people contact me via Twitter with questions and need of help. Not to mention Twitter was a simple way to keep everyone back home updated on the events on the ground.

Skype- $3 subscription for unlimited calls to and US number, iPod touch, headphones w/ mic, Skype app, and WiFi. Put them together and you can make phone calls to anyone in the US. This was useful not only to stay in contact with loved ones, but also to coordinate aid delivery.

Google Voice- If you’ve read my blog before you probably know what Google Voice is and how much I love that service. Since it is web-based, I was able to send and receive text messages as if I were on my phone in the US. Just another way to stay in contact with folks in the US who could sometimes get me information quicker than I could have gotten it by myself in Haiti.

Once again, I want to use this post to emphasize the importance of technology in aiding those in Haiti. Though not inherently helpful, without these tools workers on the ground would definitely not make as big of an impact as they are now.

Tagged with:
 

Future of Missions

As most of yall know by now I’m going to Haiti for 5 months at the ends of February. I’m traveling with a team of 6 from through the International Mission Board. There’s a few things I want to point out that excite me about how the process has gone:

*About 50% of my support came from donations of $25 or under, most of the was $10 or under

*About 50% of my support came from online donations

*All but one of my donors was 30 or younger

*Some of my support came from people I’ve never met in person from a country to which I’ve never been

*It only took 7 days to raise all of my support

So here’s my take away about what I see as the future of missions.
Don’t underestimate my generation. We are young, but not apathetic. When we see a need we step up to the plate. The internet will play a huge role. I’m able to tell far more people about my trip than I could in person. I have friends all over the world that are staying updated, some of whom, as I’ve mentioned, have never seen me in person. Finally, every dollar counts. Seriously. $1, $5, or $10 may seem small compared to the thousands that have to be raised, but it adds up. I got just as excited about donations of $5 I received as a donation of $100.

 

Tech Week: Mobile Phones

I have a Droid. Not R2D2. The phone [it was a gift]. It’s an awesome phone that does about everything. I would venture to say it’s probably the most advanced phone out there at the time of this writing. Do I absolutely need such an extravagant phone? Probably not. I’d like to mention  a few of the benefits it has to others.

Yes, people that have fancy gadgets can be the target of attacks from humanitarian groups. “The money spent on that [fill in the blank] could have fed [X number of =orphans]”  True, but I see another side of the coin. By buying gadgets and supporting the companies that make them, one eventually helps those in need. As companies sell more products, the old ones become cheaper. What was state of the art technology 20 years ago is now something that is cheaply produced and spread globally.

Today, mobile phones are becoming ubiquitous around the globe. We were able to hear and see of the events in Iran thanks to video captured on mobiles and texts and tweets sent out. Even war torn Somalia has a thriving mobile phone market.  As history has shown, the ability to  send information quickly tends to lead towards greater freedom and prosperity. [How would the protests at Tiananmen Square been different if the victims had phones?]

Phones are just one example of this benefit. Remember when flat panel TVs were $10,000? I know I didn’t buy one then, but some people did. Now they’re just a fraction of that price. We are beginning to see the spread of many affordable technologies [think One Laptop Per Child campaign] that are going to help the less fortunate. All of this is possible thanks to the companies that produce them and the early adopters that are willing to drop the big bucks.

 

Tech Week: Texting

Perhaps in a meager attempt at an excuse for lavishing myself with the latest tech toys, I’m going to use the next few posts to extoll many of the benefits of technology in our modern world. My focus will be on the church, philanthropy, and political freedom.

Today I’ll start with something that has definitely become vital in the past week.  Texting.

The infamous dominant form of communication for tweens that is destroying the English language. Bane of safe driving advocates. Texting has evolved from just a new way to say hello to an integral facet of society. At first critics asked why text a person when you could just as easily call them with the phone you’re using.  Answer? It allows people to easily and quickly communicate a short message to multiple recipients. Coupled with services like Twitter, a message can quickly spread from one person to all over the world. We saw this last summer when it was ordinary citizens with mobiles, not mainstream media, that brought us the news from within Iran [there will be more on that later]

Another obvious and beneficial use it fundraising. I’ve had this article planned for over a month. Two weeks ago I was at Passion 2010 conference in Atlanta. One of the charity projects supported there had a goal of raising $25,000. During one of the main sessions Louis Giglio gave everyone a number to text in order to donate $5. We ended up raising over $75,000. I was excited at such an awesome use of technology for good. Little did I know just two weeks later that would be blown out of the water. After the earthquake in Haiti, the Red Cross asked people to text HAITI to  90999 to donate $10. As of the writing of this article, more than $8 million has been donated in just 5 days.

 

Google Prediction

Wireless Google device (but not a cell phone)

Check out the things that already exist. Amazon Kindle, Barnes&Noble Nook, Peek.

They run over existing wireless networks. The e-books don’t have a monthly fee to access it, Peek is $20/month or $300 for lifetime service. The e-books download over the wireless signal, and the Peek gives you unlimited email service on up to 5 accounts.

So, here’s the thought. Google releases a device that allows connection to Gmail & Google Voice only. Not to make calls, but to check emails, text messages, and voicemails. I could see there being a market for that. I’m someone that would consider it. I really don’t use voice services much, most of my communication is text, email, twitter, etc. It would also be something marketable to parents of tweens. It would be a very affordable device for send text messages, somethings for which today’s youth are infamous.

Oh, and the Nook already runs on Google’s Android OS. So this could very well be something in their future.

Thoughts? Would you consider one?

 

Google Takeover: Part 5 My future with Google

After telling yall about the services I already use [Gmail, Google Docs, Calendar, Chrome] I figured I’d tell you about where I see my use of Google in the future.

1. Chrome OS

I alluded to Chrome OS in my Chrome browser review. It is supposed to be released sometime next year. It will be based on the browser build. It will run primarily web apps, suitable for cloud computing. Except for video editing, 99% of my time on my computer is spent in my web browser anyways. I will probably purchase a netbook, convenient for my many travels, with Chrome OS. Google is releasing Chrome OS for free, so the computers will be cheaper than Windows netbooks due to lack of licensing fees. Not to mention the fact that it is open source and should be faster, more stable, and have more potential than any PC ever could.

2. Android OS

Yes, that means just what you think. If you know me, then you know that I’ve wanted an iPhone since it came out. That has changed recently however. There are several reasons. There are plenty of choices in phones and carriers for the Android OS. Since they’re powered by Google, Android phones integrate much better with Google services; it’s a bit of a hassle to sync most of my Google information with my iPod Touch [iPhone OS]. This integration includes the increasingly popular Google Voice. Android gladly accepts Google Voice apps, something that Apple has famously rejected.  Finally, it’s open source. Google and the Android market seem much more open the developers than the restrictive and ambiguous iPhone App approval process.  Yes, I am now planning on getting an Android phone, possibly Droid, Eris, of the rumoured gPhone,  rather than the iPhone. Apple and AT&T better get with the program. If they rest on their laurels Google will dethrone the “invincible” iPhone before too long.

3. Mobile Phone Service?

This one is pure speculation.  Google has been providing MuniFi, city wide WiFi for free for several years in Mountain View , CA. Google also recently announced free WiFi in 47 airports around the US. I can only see the services growing. Google, along with other companies, will eventually blanket the US with free[ or cheap] WiFi. I predict we will then see a migration from traditional cell phones to WiFi enabled devices [such as iPod Touch, or dedicated WiFi phones] utilizing free VoIP  services  such as Skype. I also believe that Google Voice will eventually morph into a VoIP service to compete with Skype. Individuals will no longer have separate internet and mobile phone bills, instead we will probably pay at most a subscription fee to a nationwide WiFi signal that will power all of our devices. Just wishful thinking for now, but in 2012 when it all happens, I told you so.

 

Google Takeover: Step 4 Chrome

With so many Google goodies I feel like I need to continue my posts into the weekend. Up this round, Chrome, Google’s browser.

Google released Chrome for Windows over a year ago. Since then, those of us with computers that work have been waiting anxiously. Finally, earlier this week I was able to download a beta version of Chrome for Mac, just a day before it was publicly announced.

The Good:

First impressions are stunning. I don’t know the technical reasons why, but it is fast. I’ve heard speed used as a reason to switch to Firefox from Safari, but never noticed much of a difference. That is certainly not the case with Chrome, it’s almost been like experiencing broadband for the first time again. Other benefits include stability, if one tab crashes it doesn’t affect the others.I was able to easily import bookmarks from Firefox. Also, it just looks good. Very clean interface. Tabs at th top give a slightly larger viewing area. All around a very well designed browser. Firefox better watch out.

The bad:

The only drawbacks I’ve experienced are no doubt due to the fact that I’m using a beta version that has not even been released for a week. It does not display RSS feeds properly. GoogleGears is not supported, so I must still use Firefox for syncing and using the offline versions of Gmail, Calendar, and Docs. These, however, should be fixed in time. There also is currently no support for extensions [plugins], but seeing as the Windows Chrome just got extensions the day Mac Chrome was released, I’d say they are sure to follow for Mac as well.

Bottom line:

Beautiful, blazing fast browser. It’s also going to be the basic interface for the coming Chrome OS, a cloud computing OS that is supposed to hit the market next year. I’m considering getting a netbook when it comes out, and consider Chrome browser to be good practice to familiarize myself with it. I challenge all of my readers to try Chrome for at least one week. If you don’t like it, switch back and tell me why you didn’t like it. If you have used it already, I’d like to hear your thoughts!

Tagged with:
 

Google Takeover: Step 3 Google Docs

Chances are, if you’ve written a paper, made a spreadsheet, or a presentation on a computer ever you’ve used Microsoft Office. Even on my Mac I have a copy of Microsoft Office. I’ve used it for years with few problems.

Once again, however, Google has stepped up the game. Google Docs gives the ability to produce text, spreadsheet, and presentation documents [Word, Excel, Power Point]. I’ve been using it sporadically for the last year, but I now plan to completely replace my use of  Office with GoogleDocs.

The Good:

I feel like a broken record but being web based protects me from any danger of losing my documents and allows me to access documents from any computer. Google Gears plugin once again allows me to use GoogleDocs offline, eliminating the problem of no internet connection. Another cool feature is sharing. I can allow anyone I want to view and even edit  documents. This allows for collaboration on documents, which admittedly was cooler PW (pre-Wave).

The Bad:

GoogleDocs replaces Office for my uses, but it’s not the fully robust package the Microsoft offers. For some people that utilize Office to the fullest may be let down by the bare bones features of Docs. It lacks the ability to print straight from web. I have to export it as a .txt or PDF in order to print. I also had to use this method to submit a paper online for a class.

Botton Line:

Once again, however I’m willing to use the Google alternative despite a few drawbacks. I didn’t even mention the fact that it’s free. I paid $99 for my copy of Office and that was 4 years ago with a student discount. If you’re just using Office for simple text or spreadsheet applications I would definitely recommend switching to Google Docs.

Tagged with:
 

Google Goggles

Today is my final day of exams ever for college, so I’m taking a break from my Google Conversion posts. I do, however, want to share Google Goggles.

Just last week I was looking at a logo and thought “I wish you could take a picture of a logo and Google would tell you what it was.” Not three days later Google released the GoogleGoggles beta. It allows users of Android powered mobile phones to do just that and more. Check it out.

I am continually amazed by Google every day.

 

Google Takeover: Step 2 Google Calendar

This next step has been, perhaps, my most hesitant. I’m still not 100% satisfied with the Google solution, but am doing my best to get used to it. I have replaced iCal use with Google Calendar.

The good:

Like iCal, Google allows me to have different calandars, with different colors. I can share events or whole calendars with other Google users. As with all things Google, it’s web based, therefore accesible on any computer with an internet connection. Again, however, I am also able to access my calendar  offline via Google Gears plugin and the new offline feature in GoogleCalendar Labs[again with a dock icon].

The Bad:

I don’t have a smartphone, but use iPod touch. The calendar feature on this can only sync with iCal. I must sync my GoogleCalendar with iCal to view all of my events on my iPod. I’m can only sync one calendar with iCal and keep it viewable on my iPod, therefore limiting me to one calendar on Google. Also, I am not able to add or edit events to my GoogleCalendar via iPod. I’m forced to create a second calendar specifically for iPod adding, then sync the iPod update to iCal, then drag them to my GoogleCalendar. This would not be a problem if I wasn’t using and iPhone OS device, but I’ll save that for another post.

Final Verdict:

I’ll stick with the Gcal. It’s a bit of a pain with the iPod restrictions, but I don’t do enough updates for it to be prohibitive, mostly just use it to view events. With nearly identical in app use, web based advantage, and integration with other Google products, I’d recommend using Google Calendar for you calendar needs.